This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Reassessment Notices by Jurisdictional AO Invalid After Faceless Regime: SC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ITO Vs Prakash Pandurang Patil (Supreme Court of India)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- Supreme Court of India
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
ITO Vs Prakash Pandurang Patil (Supreme Court of India)
In a significant development for income tax reassessment procedures, the Supreme Court of India has dismissed a Special Leave Petition filed by the Income Tax Department against a Bombay High Court judgment. The case, ITO vs. Prakash Pandurang Patil, centered on the validity of a reassessment notice issued for Assessment Year 2018-19. The Supreme Court’s decision, dated August 18, 2025, not only noted a substantial delay in the Revenue’s filing but also upheld the high court’s ruling on its merits, affirming...
Author Info
The Department moved MA against this order. Now it will be tagged with another batch appeals which are pending before the SC.
thanks for confirming Bombay High court Mumbai Maharashtra decision ,only delayed in filing of petition ,since matters for important.dept need to expedite.
Classification of this case as Goods & Services Tax case is incorrect. This is a matter under Income Tax Act. Not expected from TaxGuru!