Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dr. Satish Kumar Midha Vs PCIT (ITAT Ranchi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dr. Satish Kumar Midha Vs PCIT (ITAT Ranchi) 60% Tax Under 115BBE Not for AY 2017-18 & Applies Only from AY 2018-19 -115BBE Amendment Prospective- – ITAT Ranchi Quashes 263 Orders A survey was conducted on 14.09.2016, wherein assessees admitted undisclosed income. AO completed assessments but did not apply the amended provisions of section 115BBE, which increased the tax rate from 30% to 60% w.e.f. 01.04.2017. PCIT invoked revisionary powers u/s 263, holding that AO erred in not applying the higher tax rate of 60% for AY 2017-18. Tribunal, however, noted that the amendment to section 115...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930