Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Procter and Gamble Health Private Limited Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Procter and Gamble Health Private Limited Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Distinction between “lack of inquiry” and “inadequate inquiry”: Even inadequacy of enquiry would not confer the power of revision u/s 263- Revision quashed: ITAT Mumbai Mumbai ITAT has set aside a revisionary order passed by PCIT u/s 263, holding that AO had conducted proper & adequate enquiries during the original scrutiny assessment & that the PCIT’s action was merely based on a difference of opinion. Assesseefiled its return of income for AY 2018–19 declaring Rs 174.81 crore. The return was s...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930