This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Packing & Labeling of O‑Rings Not Manufacturing—No Excise Duty Payable
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Schrader Duncan Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Schrader Duncan Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Mumbai)
The core issue was whether the packing and labeling of ‘O’ rings constituted a manufacturing activity that would attract excise duty. The tribunal ruled that it did not, aligning with the original authority’s view that the ‘O’ rings are classified under Chapter 4016 and that no excise duty was payable. The tribunal’s decision was based on the following grounds: The tribunal agreed with the original authority’s classification of the product ‘O’ rings under Chapter 4016...
Author Info
