This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Penalty Orders Invalid Due to Failure to Specify specific Default Under Section 270A(9)
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Annasaheb Namdeo Gunjal Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 21/10/2024
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Annasaheb Namdeo Gunjal Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
In the appeals filed by Annasaheb Namdeo Gunjal for Assessment Year 2017-18, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Pune, examined the legitimacy of penalties levied under Section 270A of the Income Tax Act. The penalties, amounting to ₹2,02,118 and ₹11,16,390 respectively, were imposed for alleged under-reporting of income attributed to misreporting. The core issue raised by the assessee was the procedural deficiency in the penalty orders—specifically, the Assessing Officer (AO) had not specified which of the six limbs under Section 270A(9)(...




