Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hitech Poultry Feeds Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Hitech Poultry Feeds Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Improper notice delivery & inadequate response time deemed as denial of opportunity: ITAT Bangalore  AO issued a notice u/s 271B to a mail ID not related to the assessee. Assessee acknowledged the proceedings only when AO informed him. AO further passed a penalty order u/s 271B. Assessee filed an appeal before the CIT against the said penalty order. CIT issued a notice which had to be responded within the due date specified in the notice. Without waiting till the office hours on such due date, CIT passed an order on the same day for the reason ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Specific Charge, No Penalty: Mumbai ITAT Cancels Section 270A Levy for Defective Notice Mere Investigation Wing Alert Is Not ‘Reason to Believe’: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Reopening Liquor Trader Gets Relief as ITAT Reduces GP Rate to 3.13% & Deletes Separate Expense Disallowance From Clean Chit to Crores in Penalty: SEBI Reopens Suzlon Case and Strikes Hard ITAT Restores Section 69 Matter to AO After Ex Parte Assessment and Appeal Orders View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930