Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rajendra Kumar Meena Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Rajendra Kumar Meena Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) Conclusion: Where surplus money deposited by assessee as explained was required to be considered out of the agricultural land proceed and since that land proceed had already been considered while assessing the income of the assessee as exempt the remaining amount of Rs. 46,00,000/- could not be held as income of the assessee. Therefore, addition made by AO was not sustainable. Held: Notice under section 148 was issued upon assessee by AO for reassessing the cash deposit as undisclosed income, following approval from the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031