Invocation of extended period of limitation unjustified if issue involved is purely interpretational
Case Law Details
Case Name : Yash Corporation Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad )
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Ahmedabad
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Yash Corporation Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that the issue involved is of pure interpretation of legal provisions and classification of services therefore, in absence of any no mala fide intentions and suppression of facts with intention to evade payment of service tax, extended period of limitation cannot be invoked.
Facts- On the basis of information that various contractors are providing services to Gujarat State Police Housing Corporation Ltd. (M/s GSPHCL), are not paying Service tax on the taxable services provided by them to M/s GS...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

