Case Law Details
Case Name : Arti Vs Dr. Gagandeep Goyal & 3 Ors (NCDRC Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
NCDRC/SCDRC
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Arti Vs Dr. Gagandeep Goyal & 3 Ors (NCDRC Delhi)
Conclusion: In present facts of the case, the NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI (NCDRC) observed that removal of the gall bladder instead of conducting laparoscopic surgery to remove the stones in the gall bladder without the consent of the complainant was incorrect and against medical ethics and hence the case was held to be under the ambit of ‘medical negligence’.
Facts: In present facts of the case, the revision petition was filed under section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 which assails the order ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

