Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : B. Somasundaram Vs JCIT (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
B. Somasundaram Vs JCIT (Madras High Court) Petitioner challenged the notice issued u/s 271D for for violation of Sec 269SS of IT Act. Petitioner contended that already a regular assessment order has been passed wherein, proposals were made for imposing penalty u/s 270A, 271A, 271B & 271AAC. Assessment order was later revised by invoking Sect 148 and another Assessment order has been passed, wherein, there is no proposal for imposing any penalty. Since the notice is vague, proposing imposition of penalty u/s 271D without any merits was questioned. Reliance was placed on the following decis...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930