Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sudarshan Nirman Co Vs ITO Ward 3(5) (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sudarshan Nirman Co Vs ITO Ward 3(5) (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that non-receipt of confirmation from the sundry creditors under section 133(6) of the Income Tax Act cannot result into addition since parties are identified, transaction of purchase of land is accepted and reason for outstanding amount is explained. Facts- The assessee is a partnership firm carrying on the business of builders and developers, filed its return of income at a total income of Rs.3,10,736/-. This return was processed and taken up for scrutiny under limited scrutiny and the reason of scrutiny was large investment...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930