This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 148A(d) order Passed Without Opportunity to defend is Invalid
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Packirisamy Senthilkumar Vs Government of India (Madras High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Madras High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Packirisamy Senthilkumar Vs Government of India (Madras High Court)
In the recent case of Packirisamy Senthilkumar Vs Government of India, the Madras High Court addressed an essential aspect of tax law. The judgement focused on Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, setting an important precedent for orders passed without providing an opportunity to defend. The petitioner, a Non-Resident Indian (NRI) residing in Singapore, challenged the legality and fairness of an order passed under this section.
The case revolves around an assessment order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, passed ...
Author Info
