This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Deemed dividend provisions u/s 2(22)(e) doesn’t apply to advance for business transaction
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Vishnu Aggarwal Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2013-14
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Vishnu Aggarwal Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
ITAT Delhi held that the amounts advanced for business transaction between the parties would not fall within the definition of deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e) of the Act.
Facts- AO found from the audit report of the proprietary concern of the assessee that he had availed of loan or deposit of Rs. 1,60,25,000/- from M/s. Singhal Metalloys Pvt. Ltd. in which company the assessee is also a Director having substantial shareholding. The same liability of Rs. 1,60,25,000/- as at year end has also been shown in the audited balance sheet of the assessee under...






