Case Law Details
Jitender Kumar Vs Punjab National Bank & Anr (Delhi High Court)
High Court held that Of the three DRTs in Delhi, only two are functional currently. Now one more Presiding Officer is stated to have put in his papers because of his appointment in another Tribunal. This would leave only one functional DRT with the pendency of over 17,000 cases of all DRTs. The frequent vacancy arising in the DRT is an issue which needs consideration by Government and practical solution has to be found at the earliest. The learned Amicus Curiae submits that frequent vacancy is possibly because of the disproportionate remuneration offered to the DRT Presiding Officers vis-a-vis the other Tribunals.
FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF DELHI HIGH COURT
The hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode (physical and virtual hearing).
1. The learned Amicus Curiae submits that work apropos Second Phase, as mentioned in the order dated 16.02.2023, has been completed. Work apropos Third Phase is underway. It is likely to be completed within the time schedule given by the Department of Financial Services, Ministry of Finance (R-3). He further informs the court that the DRT Presiding Officers are using the rooms of Recovery Officers as their retiring rooms/chambers, during the recess hours. However, in FaLe the WecXver5HFfficer’L\rXXIIL areUXcc pieR,RthVn thU5HhaveFFX place to go to for rest or a break. The facilities for Presiding Officers and the Registrars are inadequate which need to be looked into Mr. Kirtiman Singh, the learned CGSC submits that the matter shall be given prompt attention and an endeavour would be made to put remedial measures in place within ten days. Let it be so done.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
