Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Exercise of revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 by PCIT for substituting his opinion is untenable

Case Law Details

Case Name
Kusuma Cashews Vs PCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2017-18
Advertisement Kusuma Cashews Vs PCIT (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT Bangalore held that revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income Tax Act could not be allowed to be exercised by the PCIT either for substituting his own opinion for that of the AO or for making a fishing and roving enquiry. Facts- During the course of survey, the officials noticed that as per the books of accounts maintained in the business premises, the stock of finished goods of cashew kernels was 5,389.80 kgs. and raw materials was 81,583 kgs. On physical verification, the officials found the finished goods of 5,021 ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *