Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s. Titan Industries Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai-III (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
CA Urvashi Porwal Brief of the Case In the case of Titan Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai-III, it was held that a name or writing need not be a brand name or trade name in a sense it is normally understood. Even ordinary mark or letter is sufficient to indicate a connection between the product and the company. Further, brand name physically manifestation on the goods is not a compulsory requirement for the goods to be called as branded goods. Facts of the Case The brief facts of the case are that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of Branded jewellery fa...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930