Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Excise Duty

Physical brand embossing not must, to be called as branded goods

Case Law Details

Case Name
M/s. Titan Industries Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai-III (CESTAT Chennai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement
CA Urvashi Porwal Brief of the Case In the case of Titan Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai-III, it was held that a name or writing need not be a brand name or trade name in a sense it is normally understood. Even ordinary mark or letter is sufficient to indicate a connection between the product and the company. Further, brand name physically manifestation on the goods is not a compulsory requirement for the goods to be called as branded goods. Facts of the Case The brief facts of the case are that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of Branded jewellery fa...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *