Case Law Details
Case Name : M/s. Titan Industries Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai-III (CESTAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : E/Misc./42075/2013 (by Dept.) and Appeal No. E/326/2012 (by Assessee)
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/02/2016
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Chennai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
CA Urvashi Porwal
In the case of Titan Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai-III, it was held that a name or writing need not be a brand name or trade name in a sense it is normally understood. Even ordinary mark or letter is sufficient to indicate a connection between the product and the company. Further, brand name physically manifestation on the goods is not a compulsory requirement for the goods to be called as branded goods.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.