Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Champion Dreams Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Champion Dreams Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Coming to the view taken by Ld PCIT that the expenses claimed as “Compensation & Tenant Payment” should have been capitalised and should have been included in WIP, we are of the view that the Ld PCIT may not be fully correct in observing so. This is for the reason that, if the assessee has incurred these expenses in common and accordingly, if it is attributable to all the four flats received by the assessee, then what is required to be included in the value of “Closing WIP” is the proportionate cost of “Compensation & Tenant Payment” at...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930