Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : PCIT Vs Rakesh Sarin (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year : 1997-98 to 2002-03 and part of 2003-2004
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
PCIT Vs Rakesh Sarin (Madras High Court) Conclusion: Court under Section 260A would not interfere with the Tribunal’s finding of fact could not be applied to the facts of case because the Tribunal did not record any finding of fact that the finding of fact recorded by AO was erroneous and not borne out by records. Thus, the order passed by Tribunal for not calculating the undisclosed income was set aside Held: Assessee-individual was engaged in the business of financing. A search was conducted in the assessee’s premises and thereafter, the block assessment was completed under Secti...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930