This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 171(3A) penalty cannot be imposed retrospectively: NAA
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Shri Diwakar Bansal Vs M/s Horizon Projects Pvt. Ltd (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Shri Diwakar Bansal Vs M/s Horizon Projects Pvt. Ltd (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)
Respondent has not passed on the benefit of input tax credit to his buyers w.e.f 01.07.2017 to 30.06.2018 and hence, the Respondent has violated the provisions of Section 171 (1) of the CGST Act, 2017.
It is also revealed from the perusal of the CGST Act and the Rules framed under it that the Central Government vide Notification No. 01/2020- Central Tax dated 01.01.2020 has implemented the provisions of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019 from 01.01.2020 vide which sub-section 171 (3A) was added in Section 17...
