Case Law Details
Case Name : Satish Agarwal Vs DCIT (ITAT Jaipur)
Appeal Number : IT Appeal No. 969/2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/09/2015
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Jaipur
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Issue No.- 1 Addition on account of low GP declared by assessee:
- Assessee declared GP @ 12.57% which was increased by AO to 15% and accordingly made an addition of Rs. 1,01,755/- to the total income. The assessee had shown various expenses for job work, which was comparatively higher per unit manufacturing of carpet as compared to expenses shown by M/s Carpet Palace and M/s Supreme Carpet (sister concerns of assessee) engaged in similar business declared gross profit rate ranging from 20% to 30% during the year under consideration.
- ITAT observed that the assessee is a local trader whereas the sister concern from whom comparison made were exporters. In export business , generally the traders earns on higher side as compared to local trade. Further, assessee has shown G.P. rate during the year @ 12.57% on total sale of Rs. 39,35,037/- compared to immediate preceding year’s G.P. rate @ 13.57% on turnover of Rs. 39,89,388/-.
- ITAT placed reliance on the decision of Hon’ble Rajasthan HC in the case of CIT Vs. Inani Marbles Pvt. Ltd. (2009) 316 ITR 125 (Raj) wherein the court held that in absence of any change in the factual position normally the profit rate declared and accepted in the preceding year constitute a good basis of working out the profits.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.