This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
NAA has power to set Methodology ∓ procedure for determining anti-profiteering amount
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti-Profiteering Vs IFB Industries Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Kerala State Screening Committee Vs IFB Industries Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)
The Respondent further objected that no methodology and procedure for determining the anti-profiteering amount had been prescribed by Legislature and the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST, Act and Rule 122 to 137, being part of a taxing Statute cannot be enforced in the absence of machinery provisions for computation of the profiteered amount. He also objected that no mechanism/ guideline had been prescribed as to whether the price alteration was required to be done at entity level, State level, ...



