This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
AO cannot ignore reply submitted by Assessee related to cash deposit for Reassessment
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Hemant Manaharlal Shah (HUF) Vs ITO (Gujarat High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2010-11
- Courts
- All High Courts, Gujarat High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Hemant Manaharlal Shah (HUF) Vs ITO (Gujarat High Court)
The Assessing Officer formed a belief that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment, on the ground that noticing a big mismatch between the returned income and cash transactions in the assessee’s bank accounts, queries were raised, which remained unreplied. This is contrary to the facts on record. As noted, in reply to the notice dated 21.02.2017 issued by the Assessing Officer, the assessee had given a detailed reply on 06.03.2017. He had pointed out that he had received Rs.25 lakhs in cash for sale of...
