Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs M/S. Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : Tax Case (Appeal) Nos. 500 and 501 of 2005
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/09/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Learned counsel appearing for the assessee submitted that TDS has to be done only on the income chargeable under the Act. The payee being a loss making company and that the payment made was a composite amount covered under the DTAA, the question of there being any shortfall did not arise. We do not agree. Going by the decision of the Apex Court on Section 195(2) of the Income Tax Act that even in a case of composite amount payment, unless the assessee had approached the Officer for a certificate under Section 195(2) for applying the doctrine of proportionality, the entire amount has to suffer for deduction under Section 195(1) of the Income Tax Act.
Madras High Court
Commissioner Of Income Tax

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031