This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Explanation to section 73 supersede provision of section 43(5)(d)
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ITO Vs. M/s. Arandi Investments Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2011-12
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
ITO Vs. M/s. Arandi Investments Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai)
Assessing Officer treated loss in future and options (F&O) transactions as speculation loss and disallowed the same.
We find that on this issue, the A.O. has referred to Honorable Delhi High Court decisions on identical issue. The Honorable Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs. DLF Commercial Developers Ltd. [2013] 218 Taxman 45 (Del) has held that the provisions of the explanation to section 73 supersede the provision of section 43(5)(d).
In view of this, the loss arising on account of F & O transaction was to ...






