Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dr. N. Madhava Reddy Vs. Asst. Commissioner of Income-tax (ITAT Hyderabad)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1897/Hyd/2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/11/2017
Related Assessment Year : 2008- 09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Dr. N. Madhava Reddy Vs. ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad)

Facts of the Case

To complete the assessment u/s 143(3), the AO has to issue notice u/s 143(2) to get the jurisdiction to complete the assessment u/s 143(3). As per the provisions of section 143(2), AO has to issue the notice u/s 143(2) within 6 months from the end of the financial year in which the return is furnished. In the given case, AO must issue notice on or before 30/09/2009. But the notice was issued on 20/10/2009. Is the action of the AO proper and the provisions of section 292BB will come to rescue in the given facts of the case ? As per the ratio laid down in the case of PCIT Vs. Silver Line (supra), the Hon’ble Delhi High Court has clearly held a reassessment order cannot be passed without compliance with the mandatory requirement of notice u/s 143(2) being issued as the requirement of issuance of such notice is a jurisdictional one and section 292BB cannot cure jurisdictional error.

Held by ITAT

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031