This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No penalty for mere disallowance u/s.40(a)(ia) of expenses claimed
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Tanushree Basu Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2007- 08
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
It is a fact that assessee has claimed expenses aggregating to Rs.16,17,766/- and same were disallowed by the AO while completing the assessment under section 143(3) of the Act on the ground that assessee failed to deduct TDS. We observe that the genuineness of the claim of the assessee has not been disputed by the department. Therefore, it cannot be said that assessee has claimed expenses which are false or not genuine. Assessee has furnished all the relevant facts concerning the claim made by it in the return filed. AO has levied penalty in respect of said amount merely because said claim of...


