Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In Re- SEPCO III Electric Power Construction Corporation (AAR Delhi)
Appeal Number : A.A.R. No. 1009 of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/08/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Advance Rulings
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

SEPCO III Electric Power Construction Corporation, In Re- Advance Ruling Authority- On the date of filing of the present application before us relating to the rights and obligations arising out of the contract dated 10.5.2006 entered into by the applicant, in so far as it relates to the question posed in this application, was pending before the concerned assessing officer. We re- emphasise that merely because a questionnaire in general terms is served or a questionnaire raising specific issues is served as a further step towards completing the assessment, cannot lead to the position that the question sought to be raised before us is not pending before the assessing officer when the return of income is filed. We are, therefore, satisfied that the allowing of this application under section 245 R(2) of the Act for giving a ruling under section 245R(4) of the Act is barred by virtue of the proviso to section 245R (2) of the Act. The application is, therefore, rejected.

BEFORE THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS (INCOME TAX)
NEW DELHI

25th Day of August, 2011

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031