Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

BSE Investor Protection Fund eligible for Section 11 & 10(23EA) Relief: ITAT Mumbai

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2026 taxguru.in 13437
Case Name
DCIT Vs BSE Investors Protection Fund (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number
Premium Access
Date of Judgement/Order
Premium Access
Related Assessment Year
2009-10
Subscribe to download.

Already Upgraded? Log in.

Advertisement

DCIT Vs BSE Investors Protection Fund (ITAT Mumbai)

Summary: The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal disposed of six Revenue appeals involving BSE Investors Protection Fund for AYs 2009-10, 2012-13, 2014-15, 2016-17, 2017-18 and 2023-24 through a consolidated order, with ITA No. 7628/MUM/2025 for AY 2009-10 treated as the lead case and the findings applied mutatis mutandis to the remaining years. The assessee-trust was constituted on 10.07.1986 pursuant to Central Government and SEBI directives for protecting small investors, including compensation of eligible claims arising against defaulting trading members, investor education, awareness and research.

It was registered under section 12A and was notified by CBDT Notification No. 65/2007 dated 02.03.2007 for the purposes of section 10(23EA). For AY 2009-10, the assessee had declared total income of Rs.43,47,638 after claiming exemption under section 11. The assessment was reopened under section 147 and the Assessing Officer denied exemption under sections 11 and 12, alleging, inter alia, that BSE and its members were specified persons under section 13(3), that compensation to investors indirectly benefited defaulting members, that corpus donations of Rs.37,28,00,305 were non-exempt, that interest of Rs.6,96,09,411 on auction proceeds was taxable, and that the trust was not irrevocable, leading to invocation of section 164(2). The CIT(A) deleted the additions. Before the Tribunal, the Revenue contended that the trust’s activities benefited specified persons and that simultaneous exemption under sections 11 and 10(23EA) was unavailable under the pre-amendment section 11(7).

Want to Read the Complete Judgment?

You have read the free case summary. Unlock the full judgment, the detailed judicial reasoning and the downloadable PDF, along with every other premium judgment on TaxGuru.

Read on with Premium
Goes straight to payment. GST invoice included.

One subscription covers the entire premium judgment library, not just this case.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: Graduate, CA in Job / Business, DD
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 23,710

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.