Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Mere HC Appeal Can’t Justify Denial of Section 12AB Renewal: ITAT Mumbai

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2026 taxguru.in 8631
Case Name
Aditya Birla Education Trust Vs CIT (Exemption) (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
N.A
Advertisement

Aditya Birla Education Trust Vs CIT (Exemption) (ITAT Mumbai)

Section 12AB Renewal Rejection Set Aside as Earlier ITAT Directions Were Binding: ITAT Mumbai

The appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai Bench “A”, arose from the order dated 30.03.2026 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Mumbai rejecting the assessee’s application for renewal of registration under Section 12AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The appeal related to the renewal application filed under Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii) after the registration originally granted on 28.05.2021 was approaching expiry.

Following the statutory amendments requiring re-registration of charitable institutions, the assessee had applied under Section 12A(1)(ac)(i) on 22.04.2021 and obtained registration under Section 12AB on 28.05.2021 for five years up to Assessment Year 2026-27. During the subsistence of this registration, the trustees passed a resolution on 28.01.2022 modifying certain clauses of the trust deed to expressly incorporate and clarify objects relating to medical relief, which had earlier been pursued under the broader object of advancement of general public utility. The amended trust deed received approval from the Charity Commissioner on 02.09.2024, following which the assessee filed an application on 24.12.2024 under Section 12A(1)(ac)(v) seeking approval of the modified objects.

The Commissioner (Exemption), by order dated 30.06.2025, rejected the application and cancelled the registration primarily on three grounds: (i) the assessee had allegedly applied funds outside India for carrying out charitable activities outside India; (ii) its activities were allegedly intended to benefit a particular Marwadi community; and (iii) certain workshops, training programmes and allied activities did not constitute “education” within the meaning of the Act.

Paid content

Become a Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 21,958

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.