Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Bombay HC Rejects Section 263 Revision as AO Conducted Necessary Inquiry

Case Law Details

Case Name
CIT Vs Chandan Magraj Parmar (Bombay High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement CIT Vs Chandan Magraj Parmar (Bombay High Court) The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), which had quashed the Principal Commissioner’s revision order passed under Section 263. The appeal raised questions regarding whether the assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue, whether the Assessing Officer (AO) had conducted adequate inquiry into the capital gains claim, and whether the Tribunal had failed to consider the principles of prepon...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 18,524

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *