This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Bombay HC Rejects Section 263 Revision as AO Conducted Necessary Inquiry
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- CIT Vs Chandan Magraj Parmar (Bombay High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Bombay High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
CIT Vs Chandan Magraj Parmar (Bombay High Court)
The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), which had quashed the Principal Commissioner’s revision order passed under Section 263. The appeal raised questions regarding whether the assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue, whether the Assessing Officer (AO) had conducted adequate inquiry into the capital gains claim, and whether the Tribunal had failed to consider the principles of prepon...






