This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 68 Addition Cannot Be Sustained as Suspicion Alone Is Not Evidence: ITAT Delhi
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Cinflex Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Cinflex Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Section 68 Addition Deleted Because Assessee Proved Identity, Creditworthiness and Genuineness of Loans; Interest Disallowance Reduced Because Actual Interest Paid Must Be Considered; ITAT Restricts Section 36(1)(iii) Disallowance Because CIT(A) Applied Notional Interest Rate; Loans Held Genuine Because Documentary Evidence and Subsequent Repayment Supported Transactions.
The cross-appeals before the ITAT Delhi arose from the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for Assessment Year 2017-18. The assessee challenge...






