Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

No Section 69A Addition for Cash Deposits Explained by Disclosed Instrument Charges

Case Law Details

Case Name
Akhil Parkash (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement Akhil Parkash (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi, partly allowed the appeal of the assessee by deleting the addition of ₹23,46,000 made under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act in respect of cash deposits made during the demonetization period. The assessee, a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), owned medical equipment that had been leased to its Karta, Dr. Akhil Prakash, a neuro surgeon. The assessee received instrument charges in cash every year for the use of the equipment. To substantiate this claim, the assessee produced copies of income t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 18,551

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *