This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No Section 69A Addition for Cash Deposits Explained by Disclosed Instrument Charges
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Akhil Parkash (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Akhil Parkash (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi, partly allowed the appeal of the assessee by deleting the addition of ₹23,46,000 made under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act in respect of cash deposits made during the demonetization period.
The assessee, a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF), owned medical equipment that had been leased to its Karta, Dr. Akhil Prakash, a neuro surgeon. The assessee received instrument charges in cash every year for the use of the equipment. To substantiate this claim, the assessee produced copies of income t...




