Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Excise Duty

CESTAT Delhi Sets Aside Excise Demand as Department Had Consistently Classified Product as Chewing Tobacco

Case Law Details

Case Name
Rajan Jhiriwal Vs Additional Director General (Adjudication) (CESTAT Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
02/06/2026
Advertisement
Rajan Jhiriwal Vs Additional Director General (Adjudication) (CESTAT Delhi) The appeals before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Delhi, challenged an order dated 31.01.2022 passed by the Additional Director General (Adjudication), New Delhi. The principal issue concerned the classification of products marketed under the “MAMA” brand. The department had classified the products as “zarda scented tobacco” under Central Excise Tariff Item (CETI) 2403 99 30 and consequently confirmed demands of central excise duty, interest, and penalties. The ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 17,454

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *