Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Smt. Gurumurthappa Krishnamurthy Yashoda Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Smt. Gurumurthappa Krishnamurthy Yashoda Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) Bangalore ITAT: Section 54 Relief Cannot Be Denied If Capital Gains Are Invested Before Filing Return u/s 139(4) The Bangalore ITAT allowed the assessee’s claim for Section 54 exemption and held that capital gains invested in a new residential house before filing the return under Section 139(4) qualify for exemption even if the unutilized amount was not deposited in the Capital Gains Account Scheme before the due date under Section 139(1). The assessee had sold a residential property and earned capital gains of about ₹2.33 c...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031