Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sai Siddhi Constructions Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sai Siddhi Constructions Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) 18% Profit Rate on Contract Receipts Held Excessive – ITAT Restricts Estimation to 8% and Grants Major Relief The Pune ITAT granted substantial relief to a civil contractor by holding that estimating profit at 18% of gross receipts was excessive and unreasonable, and directed that income be computed at 8% of turnover in line with the presumptive taxation principles under section 44AD. The assessee, a Body of Individuals (BOI), had not filed a return of income for AY 2018-19. Based on information that it had received ₹1.66 crore from a charita...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Technical Glitch in Form 26A Filing Cannot Trigger Section 40(a)(ia) Disallowance: ITAT Bangalore Form 26AS Alone Cannot Decide Taxability of FD Interest: ITAT Bangalore Entire Bogus Purchases Not Taxable If Sales Accepted; Only Profit Taxable: ITAT Bangalore Bangalore ITAT Reaffirms that Transfer Pricing Adjustment Must Be Restricted Only to International Transactions with AEs Reassessment Quashed as New Allegations Exceeded Section 148A Proceedings: Karnataka HC View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031