Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Suketu Rajnikant Jhaveri Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-2009
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Suketu Rajnikant Jhaveri Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune) Mere Link with Alleged Entry Operator Not Enough – ITAT Deletes Section 68 Addition of Loan After Assessee Proves Identity, Creditworthiness and Genuineness ITAT Deletes Section 68 Loan Addition; Mere Link to Entry Operator Insufficient The Pune ITAT deleted an addition of ₹4.50 lakh under section 68, holding that once the assessee furnishes documentary evidence establishing the identity of the lender, genuineness of the transaction and creditworthiness of the creditor, the burden shifts to the Revenue to disprove the claim. Mere association...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Technical Glitch in Form 26A Filing Cannot Trigger Section 40(a)(ia) Disallowance: ITAT Bangalore Form 26AS Alone Cannot Decide Taxability of FD Interest: ITAT Bangalore Entire Bogus Purchases Not Taxable If Sales Accepted; Only Profit Taxable: ITAT Bangalore Bangalore ITAT Reaffirms that Transfer Pricing Adjustment Must Be Restricted Only to International Transactions with AEs Reassessment Quashed as New Allegations Exceeded Section 148A Proceedings: Karnataka HC View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031