Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Priya Jain Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Priya Jain Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Wrong ITR Figures ≠ Unexplained Cash Credit: Delhi ITAT Deletes ₹16.36 Cr Addition After AO’s Own Remand Verification The Delhi ITAT in Priya Jain vs ACIT deleted an addition of ₹16.36 crore made u/s 68, holding that mere correction of wrongly reported capital figures in the ITR cannot automatically lead to an unexplained cash credit addition when the assessee has substantiated the reconciliation with evidence. The assessee had originally shown opening capital of ₹3.67 crore in the earlier year, whereas the capital reflected in the current year stood a...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Entire Books Cannot Be Rejected for One Unproved Expense: ITAT Ahmedabad Section 10(10B) Exemption Allowed on BSNL VRS Compensation: ITAT Ahmedabad On-Money Addition Restricted to Co-owner’s Investment Share: ITAT Ahmedabad Section 54B: Time to Revisit Rural Agricultural Land Withdrawal Rules Section 80P(2)(d) Deduction Allowed on Interest from Co-operative Bank Deposits: ITAT Pune View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031