Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Padmavati Developers Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Padmavati Developers Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) The Mumbai ITAT held that the 10% tolerance band introduced under Section 56(2)(x)(b)(B) by the Finance Act, 2020 is curative and retrospective in nature, and therefore applicable even for AY 2018-19. Accordingly, the Tribunal deleted the addition made on account of difference between purchase consideration and stamp duty valuation where the variation was only 7.44%. The assessee had purchased immovable property for ₹1.50 crore whereas the stamp duty authority adopted a value of ₹1.61 crore, resulting in a difference of ₹11.16 lakh. The AO treate...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Addition on Loans From Wife and Company Deleted: Delhi ITAT Section 271D Penalty Quashed as Six-Month Limitation Expired: Bengaluru ITAT Mumbai ITAT Deletes Section 69A Addition as CHA Customs Duty Collections Are Fiduciary Receipts Mumbai ITAT Deletes Section 69A Addition for Recorded Jewellery Sales During Demonetisation Mumbai ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition as Marriage Gifts and Past Savings Explain Cash Deposits View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031