Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Annapurna Dibbur Girish Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Annapurna Dibbur Girish Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) The ITAT Bangalore held that claiming deduction under the wrong section (Section 54 instead of 54F) is not fatal, and restored the matter for fresh examination, while also knocking down the penalty. The assessee had sold properties and claimed deduction of ₹2.03 crore under Section 54, which the AO denied on the ground that the correct provision was Section 54F, resulting in addition to income. Although the CIT(A) dismissed the appeal as time-barred (delay of 1226 days), the Tribunal took a lenient view in the interest of natural justice, noti...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Wrong Section Used to Deny Depreciation Set-Off; Section 263 Order Quashed Municipal Body’s Section 10(20) Exemption Cannot Be Denied Due to Wrong Claim in Return No Addition on a Different Issue if Reopened Issue Fails: ITAT Deletes ₹5.75 Crore Disallowance Retracted Statement Alone Cannot Justify Section 68 Addition: ITAT Deletes Accommodation Loan Additions Section 263 Cannot Be Invoked as AO Made No Addition After Enquiry: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930