Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jayant Warping Works Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16 to 2020-2021
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Jayant Warping Works Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Section 68 Addition Deleted in Search Case – No Incriminating Material “Dumb Documents” Rejected Mumbai ITAT delivered a detailed ruling deleting additions made u/s 68 and 69C in search assessments, holding that in absence of incriminating material, no addition can be sustained in unabated assessments. On unsecured loans (₹50 lakh u/s 68): Assessee furnished complete documentary evidence: PAN, ITR, financials, confirmations, bank statements AO relied on: Investigation Wing reports (Kolkata) Third-party statements (later retracted) Tribu...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Restores Section 80P Deduction Claim of Agricultural Credit Co-op Society Missing Safety Certificates Justified Section 12AB Registration Rejection: Bengaluru ITAT Absence of Irrevocability Clause Alone No Ground to Deny Section 12AB Registration: ITAT Mumbai Sections 234B & 234C Interest Excluded from Tax Effect for Appeal Limit: ITAT Mumbai Earlier Loan Repayment via Bank Not Taxable Under Section 68: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031