Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ghewar Chand Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ghewar Chand Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Mumbai ITAT deleted additions made u/s 69 towards alleged cash (on-money) payment for purchase of shop in the Platinum Mall (Rubberwala Group) case. The Tribunal held that: The addition was based solely on third-party statements and Excel data from a pen drive, with no incriminating material found from the assessee The alleged evidence was neither confronted nor subjected to cross-examination, violating principles of natural justice No independent corroborative evidence was brought on record to establish actual cash payment by the assessee Even though t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930