Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Usha Dilipbhai Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Usha Dilipbhai Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) In this case, the ITAT Ahmedabad held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) cannot be levied merely because the assessee made an incorrect claim, particularly when all facts were duly disclosed. The Tribunal noted that: The addition was made treating loan as deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e), However, the assessee had already disclosed the transaction in audited books, The difference arose only due to interpretation/treatment of income, and not due to concealment. The ITAT held that: Wrong claim ≠ concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars, When details a...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930