This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Service Tax Demand Set Aside as 15% Retention from Port Dues Was Not Commission
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Kakinada Seaports Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Hyderabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Kakinada Seaports Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax (CESTAT Hyderabad)
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad Bench, allowed two appeals filed by the appellant challenging orders confirming service tax demands under the categories of Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) and Port Services. The first order dated 25.09.2012 confirmed service tax of ₹84,40,687 along with penalty under Section 78 for the period from 01.07.2006 to 31.03.2012. The second order dated 30.09.2015 confirmed service tax of ₹98,14,521 under BAS for April 2012 to Jun...
Author Info
