Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Meghna Banga Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Meghna Banga Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) The ITAT Delhi partly allowed the assessee’s appeal relating to addition u/s 69A for alleged unexplained cash investment of ₹19.94 lakh paid to Jindal Bullion Ltd based on seized digital data. The CIT(A) had already granted partial relief by accepting ₹9.54 lakh as explained from accumulated cash withdrawals from joint bank accounts of the assessee and her salaried husband, but sustained balance addition of ₹10.39 lakh. The Tribunal noted that the assessee was a housewife and her husband had substantial disclosed income, and that CIT(A) himself accepte...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Addition on Loans From Wife and Company Deleted: Delhi ITAT Section 271D Penalty Quashed as Six-Month Limitation Expired: Bengaluru ITAT Mumbai ITAT Deletes Section 69A Addition as CHA Customs Duty Collections Are Fiduciary Receipts Mumbai ITAT Deletes Section 69A Addition for Recorded Jewellery Sales During Demonetisation Mumbai ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition as Marriage Gifts and Past Savings Explain Cash Deposits View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031