Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Alex Puthenchira Johnson Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Alex Puthenchira Johnson Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) Assessee challenged NFAC order where CIT(A) set aside reassessment orders & restored matters to AO for de-novo adjudication relating to additions u/s 2(22)(e) (deemed dividend). Assessment orders were passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s 147 & not u/s 144. ITAT held that powers of CIT(A) u/s 251 to set aside assessment & remand to AO are restricted. Such power exists only where assessment is framed u/s 144 (as per amended provisions). Since impugned assessments were not u/s 144, CIT(A) exceeded jurisdiction by remanding matter. CIT(A) is duty-bo...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930