Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Section 270A Penalty Invalid for Not Specifying Applicable Limb

Case Law Details

Case Name
Laxmichand And Company Vs DCIT/ACIT (ITAT Agra)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2017-18
Advertisement
Laxmichand And Company Vs DCIT/ACIT (ITAT Agra) Penalty u/s 270A Quashed for Estimated Addition and Non-Specification of Limb; NP Rate Difference Cannot Attract Penalty – ITAT Agra The Agra Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal and deleted penalty of ₹11.76 lakh levied under section 270A for AY 2017-18, holding that penalty was unsustainable both on facts and in law. The assessee, a civil contractor, had declared net profit at 4.22% on contract receipts of ₹44.31 crore. The Assessing Officer rejected the books under section 145(3) and estimated profit at 4.65%, making an addi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,493

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *