This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 270A Penalty Invalid for Not Specifying Applicable Limb
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Laxmichand And Company Vs DCIT/ACIT (ITAT Agra)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Laxmichand And Company Vs DCIT/ACIT (ITAT Agra)
Penalty u/s 270A Quashed for Estimated Addition and Non-Specification of Limb; NP Rate Difference Cannot Attract Penalty – ITAT Agra
The Agra Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal and deleted penalty of ₹11.76 lakh levied under section 270A for AY 2017-18, holding that penalty was unsustainable both on facts and in law.
The assessee, a civil contractor, had declared net profit at 4.22% on contract receipts of ₹44.31 crore. The Assessing Officer rejected the books under section 145(3) and estimated profit at 4.65%, making an addi...





