Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Chandrashekhar Vishnu Paranjape (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Chandrashekhar Vishnu Paranjape (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) FMV as on 01.04.1981 Cannot Be Replaced by Stamp Rates Without DVO Reference: ITAT Pune Remands Capital Gains Issue The Pune Bench of the ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee (HUF) for AY 2015-16 for statistical purposes and set aside the determination of long-term capital gains on the ground that the Assessing Officer rejected the registered valuer’s report without referring the matter to the Departmental Valuation Officer (DVO). In the instant case, the assessee had adopted the fair market value (FMV) of land as on 01.04.1981 at â...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031