Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Demonetisation Cash Addition Deleted Because Funds Belonged to Members

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2026 taxguru.in 872
Case Name
Sant Savta Gramin Bigar Seti Sahakari Pathasanstha Maryadit Vs Assessment Unit (ITAT Pune)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2017-18
Advertisement

Sant Savta Gramin Bigar Seti Sahakari Pathasanstha Maryadit Vs Assessment Unit (ITAT Pune)

Cash Belonging to Members Not Taxable in Society’s Hands; Bank Interest Also Eligible for Section 80P — ITAT Pune Allows Co-operative Society’s Appeal

The Pune SMC Bench of the ITAT allowed the appeals of Shree Sant Savta Gramin Bigar Seti Sahakari Pathasanstha Maryadit for AYs 2017-18 and 2018-19, granting full relief on both major issues—addition of demonetisation cash deposits and denial of deduction under section 80P on bank interest.

Key holdings of the Tribunal:

  • Demonetisation cash deposits (₹60.32 lakh) deleted:
    Although cash was deposited during the demonetisation period, the AO himself accepted that the cash belonged to members of the co-operative society. Once this factual position was admitted, the Tribunal held that no addition could be made in the hands of the society, as the money did not belong to it. Reliance was placed on the Pune ITAT decision in Bhagur Urban Credit Co-operative Society Ltd., and the addition made u/s 68 was ordered to be deleted.
  • Section 80P deduction on bank interest allowed:
    Interest earned from State Bank of India and Bank of India was held to be eligible for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i). The Tribunal distinguished Totgar’s and followed:
    • AP & Telangana HC in Vavveru Co-operative Rural Bank Ltd., and
    • Kerala HC in Sahyadri Co-operative Credit Society Ltd. (2024),
      holding that interest earned by depositing surplus funds (arising from credit-facility business) in permitted banks does not lose its character as business income attributable to the activity of providing credit facilities to members.
  • Character of income unchanged:
    Prudent deployment of surplus funds in banks, as permitted under co-operative laws, cannot convert business income into “income from other sources”.
  • Both years covered:
    Since facts were identical, relief granted for AY 2017-18 was applied mutatis mutandis to AY 2018-19.

Accordingly, the ITAT allowed both appeals in full, deleting the demonetisation-related addition and directing the AO to grant deduction under section 80P on bank interest income.

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT PUNE

Paid content

Become a Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 7,067

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.