Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT Mumbai Sustained Section 271(1)(c) Penalty for Unsubstantiated Expense Claims

Case Law Details

Case Name
Classic Share & Stock Broking Services Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2012-13
Advertisement Classic Share & Stock Broking Services Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) The appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai arose from an order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre confirming the levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for AY 2012-13. The assessee challenged the penalty primarily on the ground that the notice issued under section 274 read with section 271(1)(c) was a printed notice which did not specify whether the penalty was for concealment of income or for furnishing inaccurate particulars, alleging non-application of...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 18,855

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *